| School Name | Cooper City HS (1931) | School Grade (2024 - 2025) | A |
| Title 1 School | No | School Improvement (SI) | No |
| School of Excellence | Yes | ESSA School | No |
|
RAISE
Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence |
No | ||
| SAC Documentation/SAC Upload Center |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Cognia-Executive-Summary_CCHS.pdf | Evelyn Lopez | 9/12/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| CCHS_2025-2026_Budget-Signature-Page.pdf | Tara Daub | 5/30/2025 |
|
Using the data below, describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system. Multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) Early Warning Indicators |
|
|
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May 2026, Social Studies achievement will increase from 89% to 92% as measured by the U.S. History EOC exam. School-wide Literacy Initiative, Data Driven Instruction, Mastery Connect, Closing the Achievement Gaps through supports of subgroups (ESOL/ ESE) Performance Matters, Canvas, Focus, Monthly Common Formative assessments and analyzing data utilizing the CARE Cycle through PLCs. | Nicole Marsala regularly sends out PD as it becomes available. This information will then sent to the team. | NA | The U.S. History Team will progress monitoring through common assessments, district quarterly assessments, the BSA and Performance Matters. Students will be offered Extended Learning Opportunities after school later in the school year. All students are welcome. Students may earn extra credit incentives for attending. Students who are not demonstrating proficiency will be given a special invitation by their teacher. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The U.S. History teaching team actively utilizes common assessment data to identify and address key topics and skills for review. During the first quarter district assessment, students achieved a 70% proficiency rate. This data has been instrumental in identifying areas requiring remediation and opportunities for possible extended learning within the classroom. To further evaluate student understanding, an informal mock End-of-Course (EOC) exam was administered on September 10, 2025. Upon completion of the mock EOC, the teacher unpacked the question stems with students and reviewed the answers. This comprehensive assessment covered standards for the entire course, offering insight into students' knowledge based on the first quarter's instruction. Results will guide instructional focus for rest of the academic year. The team administered additional progress-monitoring tools, including the Q2 district assessment. These evaluations support tracking student growth and identifying individual needs, ensuring readiness for the final EOC exam. According to Performance Matters data, students demonstrated 48% proficiency.To reinforce learning, all U.S. History teachers incorporate mini-assessments through Canvas and SAT-aligned practice. These content-specific activities provide students with targeted questions and feedback during each class session, fostering continuous improvement. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| T
The U.S. History Team’s plan demonstrates several strengths, particularly in its commitment to ongoing progress monitoring and targeted student support. By utilizing multiple data sources, common assessments, district quarterly assessments, and Performance Matters. The team ensures a comprehensive and data-driven approach to measuring student achievement. This monitoring system allows teachers to identify learning gaps in a timely manner and adjust instruction accordingly. The inclusion of Extended Learning Opportunities (ELOs) after school further reflects a proactive effort to provide additional instructional time for students who need support.
However, the plan also presents several potential weaknesses. The strong emphasis on assessments may contribute to over-testing and shift focus toward test performance rather than deeper historical analysis and critical thinking skills. While after-school support is beneficial, it may unintentionally create equity concerns, as some students may be unable to attend due to transportation, work, family responsibilities, or extracurricular commitments.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The U.S. History team analyzes data from both in-class assessments and county-provided evaluations to reinforce key standards covered on the U.S. History End-of-Course (EOC) exam. This data-driven approach ensures targeted instruction and maximizes student preparedness. The U.S. History team is planning the ELO calendar currently. U.S. History tutoring most likely will be Thursday, with possible Saturday sessions. Additionally, the team is implementing incentives to promote consistent student engagement and participation, recognizing the critical role regular attendance plays in academic success. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By June 2026, Algebra Achievement scores will increase from 62% to 64% as measured by the Algebra EOC. | The Algebra teachers will be trained to use and implement ALEKS, Savvas, B.E.S.T. Standards, and the Schoolwide Literacy Initiative. Instruction will be data-driven, with a focused effort to close the achievement gap by providing targeted support for ESE, ELL, and the lowest 25% of students | NA | Formative Assessments and data analysis will be used to implement the CARE Cycle through PLCs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| According to BSA #2 results, 59% of students are currently on track to reach proficiency. Ongoing instruction and support will enable students to continue progressing toward the identified learning target. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Utilize standards-aligned resources that correlate with the Algebra EOC. Implement common formative assessments aligned to the standards. Design lessons and activities that effectively prepare students for the EOC. Use ALEKS to remediate skills and close identified achievement gaps. Incorporate IXL as a supplemental resource aligned to the standards. Incorporate Savvas as a supplemental resource aligned to the standards. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Students who require additional support should be encouraged to attend tutoring regularly, and families should be informed of the importance of consistent participation in these opportunities. Establishing weekly ALEKS topic goals will provide targeted remediation, help address skill gaps, and support steady progress toward mastery of Algebra standards. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Reflections (optional): Please add any additional reflections for this Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Student performance will be monitored through classroom assignments, assessments, and ALEKS lesson progression data. This information will be used to evaluate student understanding, track growth over time, and identify areas in need of targeted instructional support or remediation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By June 2026, the percentage of Level 3 or higher in 9th and 10th grade will increase from 73% to 76% as measured by the ELA FAST PM 3. | Data Driven Instruction, FAST Progress Monitoring, ESOL Strategies, School Wide Literacy Initiative, BEST Standards, Read 180 and Read 180 The Code | ELA FAST Progress Monitoring 1 and 2, Common Formative Assessments every other month, and analyzing data utilizing the CARE Cycle through PLCs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Based on Progress Monitoring (PM) 2 data, the percentage of proficient students increased from 57% proficiency in PM 1 to 63% proficiency in PM 2. This reflects a 6% improvement in student proficiency. The scholars increased their performance on PM 2 this year with 63% proficiency compared to 2024-2025 SY PM 2 data with 60% proficiency. Some of the implementation challenges CCHS encountered concerned the ELL subgroup. This subgroup did not score as well as the other subgoups at CCHS. The changes made to address this challenge was professional development for the Literacy department during Team Tuesday. The professional development focused on ESOL strategies using the resources from Ellevation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Low-performing subgroups have been identified and are receiving individualized support through strategic push-in interventions facilitated by the Literacy Coach. In addition, teachers utilize effective instructional strategies, such as chunking lessons into manageable segments and conducting frequent checks for understanding throughout the lesson. These practices ensure that all students can engage with the material and achieve comprehension. The weaknesses we encounter as a department are the utilization of all the resources provided with fidelity. This weakness is being addressed by walkthroughs and the Literacy Coach pushing into classrooms and using the coaching cycle. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weekly Extended Learning Opportunities (ELOs) have been implemented to support student success. These sessions will be offered beginning of February, on Tuesdays and Saturdays, providing additional instructional time for targeted learning. All students are welcome to attend Extended Learning Opportunities. Students who scored a Level 1 or 2 on PM 2 will be encouraged to attend ELOs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The percentage of Biology students scoring proficient or higher on the Biology EOC will increase from 77% to 79% by the end of June, 2026 as measured by the Biology EOC. | Peer Observation and District trainings as needed. | Monitoring will be done through Performance Matters, Common unit tests, and zip grade analysis. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Biology teachers are using BSA quarterly testing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Teachers are trying to improve student retention rates by spiraling into new units and will continue EOC practice. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Low - performing students will be targeted for ELO and study hall peer tutoring. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The percentage of CCHS students earning Acceleration points will increase from 85% (rate as of 6/4/25, prior to the release of AP and AICE scores) to 90% by June of 2026 as measured by Dual Enrollment, CTE Industry Certifications, AICE, and Advanced Placement Exams. | School-wide Literacy Initiative and Differentiated Instruction | Monitoring will be conducted through Professional Learning Communities, Data Driven Instruction, Common Formative Assessments, mock exams for AP and AICE, and Gmetrix and pre-tests for CTE testing platforms. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The strategies we have implemented to increase student acceleration are ensuring that all eligible scholars have the option to enroll in an accelerated course. Currently, Cooper City High School has 1,398 students enrolled in CTE courses and 1,130 students enrolled in AP classes. We decreased our enrollment in AICE courses by 13%, from 1,339 students in the 2025 school year to 1,157 this school year. In addition, there are students enrolled in multiple accelerated courses. Cooper City High School has ordered 2,114 AP exams and 2,412 AICE exams, ensuring the highest acceleration rate possible. More students have been afforded the opportunity to take AP and AICE classes and have been empowered to do so. Teachers are tracking data and participating in ongoing check-ins and data chats with students who are not achieving at their expected level. Tracking data on student progress and participation in interventions allows the teachers to identify any gaps in learning or areas where students need more support. Forecast grades, which provide early insights into student performance, are another key measure to evaluate the success of the acceleration strategies. These grades allow the school to track student progress and predict future success, offering an early indication of whether students are benefiting from the accelerated courses. For example, students taking some CTE courses require an 80% or above on the Gmetrix practice test before administration of the official IC exam. By using these measures, Cooper City High School can evaluate the effectiveness of its strategies in providing more students with access to accelerated coursework and support systems, thereby enhancing academic acceleration. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Based on the data in FOCUS and the number of students enrolled in Advanced Placement (AP), Advanced International Certificate of Education (AICE), Career Technical Education (CTE) courses, and Dual Enrollment courses we must continue to monitor student progress and continue IC practice tests to ensure students are meeting all requirements for each IC. For example, students taking some IC courses require an 80% or above on the Gmetrix practice test before administration of the official IC exam. Currently, there are 10 CTE students who will be testing for an Industry Certification in January. Using the forecast grades and mini assessments will provide an opportunity to develop ELOs targeted to those specific areas of need. All students, not just those needing growth, should be encouraged to attend ELOs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Teachers can ensure that students have a good grasp of content vocabulary in all courses. Targeted ELOs should continue, and perhaps leveling/small group rotations can be implemented in AICE and AP courses. Pull-outs may help as well. In addition, they can use incentives for students to do well on the AP, AICE, and IC exams, thus giving them a reason to “want” to pass. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Reflections (optional): Please add any additional reflections for this Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Across our accelerated and CTE courses, PLC discussions/best practice discussions, and midterms reported (by teachers), data demonstrates a trend upwards. It is still “early” in the process, and forecast grades will yield more information. We have 10 students ready to test for an Industry Certification. Through data chats, daily class grades, projects, and practice tests in Gmetrix, teachers see an upward trend in progress toward the 80% goal needed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 2025_2026_SIP-K-12_CERP_Literacy_Leadership_Contact_Information_CCHS.pdf | Evelyn Lopez | 9/5/2025 |
| Literacy-Team-Sign-in-Sheet-and-Agenda.pdf | Evelyn Lopez | 9/25/2025 |
PLC Meeting Schedule
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| MTSS-Action-Plan-Cooper-City-High-School-25-26.pdf | Evelyn Lopez | 9/9/2025 |
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
|
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SPBP-25-26_CCHS.pdf | Tara Daub | 4/28/2025 |
| Cooper-City-HS_SPBP-Feedback_-25-26.pdf | Donna Lindsay | 5/22/2025 |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Grade Level | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Attendance Type | School Goal |
|---|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SIP_Attendance-Plan_CCHS.pdf | Evelyn Lopez | 9/12/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| life-skills-and-wellness-plan.pdf | Percita Goedschalk | 9/12/2025 |
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| BPIE_2526_CCHS.pdf | Evelyn Lopez | 9/12/2025 |
SAC Upload Center
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Cooper-City-HS-BCPS-PARENT-CUSTOMER-SURVEY-2025.pdf | Jamillah Shakir | 9/8/2025 |
| Cooper-City-HS-BCPS-SCHOOL-STAFF-CUSTOMER-SURVEY-2025.pdf | Jamillah Shakir | 9/8/2025 |
| Cooper-City-HS-BCPS-STUDENT-(Grades-6-12)-CUSTOMER-SURVEY-2025.pdf | Jamillah Shakir | 9/24/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| FACE-SPACE.jpg | Percita Goedschalk | 9/12/2025 |