| School Name | Indian Trace ES (3181) | School Grade (2024 - 2025) | |
| Title 1 School | No | School Improvement (SI) | No |
| School of Excellence | Yes | ESSA School | No |
|
RAISE
Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence |
No | ||
| SAC Documentation/SAC Upload Center |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Indian-Trace-Elementary-EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY-2025.2026-final.pdf | Renell Schultz | 8/27/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| ITE-Budget-Worksheet-Signed-2025.26.pdf | Amy E. Winder | 6/16/2025 |
|
Using the data below, describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system. The following strategies are being implemented to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system:
Students complete iReady Reading and Math differentiated lessons for 45 minutes per week.
Students receive reading interventions in their classrooms Monday-Friday.
Students receive math interventions in their classrooms Monday-Friday.
The ELL groups are receiving intervention strategies. The lowest quartile students in math and reading are receiving intervention strategies.
Students who have attendance issues are monitored by the guidance counselor. If needed, the social worker will follow up. |
|
|
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% of the students in grades 4 and 5 achieved learning gains in Math as evidenced by the FAST Progress Monitoring #3 in 2025. By June 2026, 77% of the students in grades 4 and 5 will demonstrate learning gains in Math as evidenced by the FAST Progress Monitoring #3. | We will have ongoing training for the Envision Math Series, iReady Math, and other intervention materials to support teaching and learning. | $500.00 | FAST Math Progress Monitoring, iReady Diagnostic Data, Math Chapter Assessments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The FAST PM2 assessment administered in December presented challenges due to student travel and illness. Some classes and students experienced difficulty adhering to the EnVision math assessment window. These challenges were addressed by ensuring all classes were aligned in pacing and by providing opportunities for students to complete make-up assessments upon their return from vacation or illness. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| We will provide enrichment activities for students who score at the proficient level or higher on FAST PM #1 and PM #2. Strengths: Teachers review FAST and i-Ready reports to effectively identify students’ academic strengths and needs. Use of small group Look-Fors and Review of how to use MDIS. Weaknesses: Ensuring consistent small-group implementation with fidelity and confirming that enrichment activities are occurring as planned. We will participate in Math Fact Mania through weekly Monday math speed drills with incentives. Strengths: Increased math fact fluency across all grade levels. Weaknesses: Ensuring consistent participation by all teachers and uniform implementation of incentives school wide. We will implement the i-Ready Math Program, including (but not limited to) Fluency Flight and differentiated math pathways. Strengths: Professional development has been provided to support implementation. Weaknesses: Teachers experience difficulty identifying the most effective i-Ready resources to use in conjunction with EnVision and Elementary Learning materials. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Continue providing targeted small-group enrichment and interventions. Offer Extended Learning Opportunities for students in grades 4-5. Ensure that WIN support groups are effective and aligned with classroom instruction. Ensure ESE support services meet individual student needs/ IEP goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Reflections (optional): Please add any additional reflections for this Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Currently 56% of the students in grades 4 and 5 have demonstrated learning gains in Math as evidenced by the FAST Progress Monitoring #2. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59% of students in the lowest quartile achieved a learning gain in ELA on the FAST PM #3 in 2025. By June 2026, at least 70% of students in grades 3-5 in the lowest quartile will demonstrate a learning gain in ELA as evidenced by the FAST PM #3. | We will have iReady training to support teaching and learning. | FAST Progress Monitoring Assessments, Benchmark Advanced Unit Assessments and iReady Assessments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The FAST PM2 assessment administered in December presented challenges due to student travel and illness. These challenges were addressed by ensuring all classes were aligned in pacing and by providing opportunities for students to complete make-up assessments upon their return from vacation or illness. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| We will implement targeted intervention groups using small-group instruction based on specific ELA needs. Strengths: Targeted small-group instruction is in place, the master schedule has been adjusted to protect the WIN block, and district diagnostic screeners are used to identify learning gaps. Weaknesses: Targeted intervention groups are not always standards-based or implemented daily with fidelity to fully meet all students’ needs. We will use the i-Ready Reading Program to remediate and differentiate instruction. Strengths: Professional development has occurred and is ongoing. The i-Ready phonics initiative was implemented in Quarter 1, and Magnetic Reading books are used in grades 4 and 5 with accompanying professional development. Weaknesses: Not all students are consistently completing the recommended two lessons/ 45 minutes per week. We will implement the Benchmark Advance Reading Program and integrate content-area reading across subjects. Strengths: Professional development has occurred and is ongoing. Benchmark Advance is implemented in all classrooms as Tier 1 instruction. AI tools are being leveraged to support comprehension within ESE groups. Weaknesses: Inconsistent pacing across teachers and grade levels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Continue providing targeted small-group enrichment and interventions. Offer Extended Learning Opportunities for students in grades 3-5 in ELA. Ensure that WIN support groups are effective and aligned with classroom instruction. Ensure ESE support services meet individual student needs/ IEP goals. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Reflections (optional): Please add any additional reflections for this Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Currently, 84% of students in grades 3–5 in the lowest quartile have demonstrated a learning gain in ELA, as evidenced by FAST PM #2. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84% of students in grades K-2 demonstrated proficiency in ELA on the STAR and FAST PM #3 Assessment in 2025. . By June 2026, 85% of students in grades K-2 will demonstrate proficiency in ELA as evidenced by the STAR and FAST PM #3 Assessment. | We will have ongoing training for the Benchmark Advanced Reading Program, iReady, Reading Horizons, and other intervention materials to support teaching and learning. | $500.00 | STAR Assessment, Benchmark Advanced Unit Assessments and iReady Assessments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The FAST PM2 assessment administered in December presented challenges due to student travel and illness. These challenges were addressed by ensuring all classes were aligned in pacing and by providing opportunities for students to complete make-up assessments upon their return from vacation or illness. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| We will implement targeted intervention groups for ELL students using small-group instruction based on specific ELA needs. Strengths: ELL students receive targeted support during the protected WIN block. Weaknesses: There is a need for additional instructional strategies to support long-term ELL students who have been enrolled for more than one year. We will use the i-Ready Reading Program to remediate and differentiate instruction. Strengths: Professional development has occurred and is ongoing. The i-Ready phonics initiative was implemented in Quarter 1, and Magnetic Reading books are used in grades 4 and 5 with accompanying professional development. Weaknesses: Not all students are consistently completing the recommended two lessons/ 45 minutes per week. We will implement the Benchmark Advance Reading Program and integrate content-area reading across subjects. Strengths: Professional development has occurred and is ongoing. Benchmark Advance is implemented in all classrooms as Tier 1 instruction. AI tools are being leveraged to support comprehension within ESE groups. Weaknesses: Inconsistent pacing across teachers and grade levels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Continue providing targeted small-group enrichment and interventions. Ensure that WIN support groups are effective and aligned with classroom instruction. Ensure ESE support services meet individual student needs/ IEP goals. Meet with individual teams to review data and discuss next steps. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82% of students in grades 3-5 demonstrated proficiency in ELA on the FAST PM #3 in 2025. By June 2026, 84% of students in grades 3-5 will demonstrate proficiency in ELA as evidenced by the FAST Progress Monitoring #3. | We will have ongoing training for the Benchmark Advanced Reading Program, iReady, Reading Horizons, and other intervention materials to support teaching and learning. | $500.00 | FAST Progress Monitoring Assessments, Benchmark Advanced Unit Assessments and iReady Assessments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The FAST PM2 assessment administered in December presented challenges due to student travel and illness. These challenges were addressed by ensuring all classes were aligned in pacing and by providing opportunities for students to complete make-up assessments upon their return from vacation or illness. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| We will implement targeted intervention groups for ELL students using small-group instruction based on specific ELA needs. Strengths: ELL students receive targeted support during the protected WIN block. Weaknesses: There is a need for additional instructional strategies to support long-term ELL students who have been enrolled for more than one year. We will use the i-Ready Reading Program to remediate and differentiate instruction. Strengths: Professional development has occurred and is ongoing. The i-Ready phonics initiative was implemented in Quarter 1, and Magnetic Reading books are used in grades 4 and 5 with accompanying professional development. Weaknesses: Not all students are consistently completing the recommended two lessons/ 45 minutes per week. We will implement the Benchmark Advance Reading Program and integrate content-area reading across subjects. Strengths: Professional development has occurred and is ongoing. Benchmark Advance is implemented in all classrooms as Tier 1 instruction. AI tools are being leveraged to support comprehension within ESE groups. Weaknesses: Inconsistent pacing across teachers and grade levels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Continue providing targeted small-group enrichment and interventions. Offer Extended Learning Opportunities for students in grades 3-5 in ELA. Ensure that WIN support groups are effective and aligned with classroom instruction. Ensure ESE support services meet individual student needs/ IEP goals. Meet with individual teams to review data and discuss next steps. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Reflections (optional): Please add any additional reflections for this Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Currently 83% of students in grades 3-5 have demonstrated proficiency in ELA as evidenced by the FAST Progress Monitoring #2. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Science-of-Reading-part-1.pdf | Renell Schultz | 9/5/2025 |
| Science-of-Reading-part-2.pdf | Renell Schultz | 9/5/2025 |
| Science-of-Reading-part-3.pdf | Renell Schultz | 9/5/2025 |
| Science-of-Reading-part-3-for-ESE-students.pdf | Renell Schultz | 9/5/2025 |
| CERP-2025.2026.pdf | Renell Schultz | 9/9/2025 |
| CERP-meeting-sign-in-sheet-2025.2026.pdf | Renell Schultz | 9/9/2025 |
| CERP-Agenda-25_26.pdf | Renell Schultz | 9/9/2025 |
| Indian-Trace-SIP-reading-Plan--25_26.pdf | Renell Schultz | 9/9/2025 |
PLC Meeting Schedule
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| ITE-MTSS-ACTION-PLAN-2025_2026.pdf | Renell Schultz | 8/21/2025 |
| Spring_25_Broward_Indian-Trace-Elementary-School_SAM_Dashboard.pdf | Melissa Hallett | 4/9/2026 |
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
|
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SPBP_Indian-Trace-ES_-25-26-SY.pdf | Angela Cohen | 4/22/2025 |
| Indian-Trace-ES-SPBP-Feedback-Form-2025-2026-B.pdf | CHAVIS JAVON YOUNGBLOOD | 5/23/2025 |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Grade Level | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Attendance Type | School Goal |
|---|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Indian-Trace-Elementary-School-SIP-Attendance-Plan-2025.26.pdf | Amy E. Winder | 9/8/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| ASCSP-Indian-Trace-Elementary-25_26.pdf | Angela Cohen | 8/26/2025 |
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Indian-Trace-BPIE-2025.pdf | Renell Schultz | 8/25/2025 |
SAC Upload Center
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-Staff-Customer-Survey-Results.pdf | Amy E. Winder | 6/16/2025 |
| 2025-Student-Customer-Survey-Results.pdf | Amy E. Winder | 6/16/2025 |
| 2025Parent-Customer-Survey-Results.pdf | Amy E. Winder | 6/16/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Indian-Trace-FACE-Space-location-8.27.2025.pdf | Renell Schultz | 8/27/2025 |
| Indian-Trace-FACE-Space-9.30.2025.pdf | Renell Schultz | 9/30/2025 |
| Indian-Trace-FACE-Space-Final.pdf | Renell Schultz | 10/6/2025 |
| Indian-Trace-FACE-space-November.pdf | Renell Schultz | 11/18/2025 |
| FACE-Space-December.pdf | Renell Schultz | 2/19/2026 |
| FACE-Space-January-2026.pdf | Renell Schultz | 2/19/2026 |
| FACE-Space-February-2026.pdf | Renell Schultz | 2/19/2026 |
| FACE-space-April.pdf | Renell Schultz | 5/1/2026 |
| FACE-Space-March-2026.pdf | Renell Schultz | 5/1/2026 |
| FACE-space-MAY-2026.pdf | Renell Schultz | 5/1/2026 |