| School Name | Harbordale ES (0491) | School Grade (2024 - 2025) | |
| Title 1 School | No | School Improvement (SI) | No |
| School of Excellence | Yes | ESSA School | No |
|
RAISE
Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence |
No | ||
| SAC Documentation/SAC Upload Center |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 0491_09092025_Cognia-Executive-Summary-Harbordale.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/18/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Harbordale-ES-2026-Signed-Budget-Revenue-Worksheet.pdf | Nicole Ferraro | 6/5/2025 |
|
Using the data below, describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system. Our school data from the 2023-2024 school year suggests a few areas for improvement. The first area is with chronic student absenteeism. We had 111 students that were absent 10% or more days during the school year. This year, strategies have been implemented to be more proactive before students become chronically absent. We have incorporated monthly attendance meetings as part of our MTSS/RTI meetings. At these meetings, team members are assigned to follow up with any parent of a student who is showing early signs of an attendance concern. An individualized plan is created with the parent to address and support attendance concerns. The team member reports back to MTSS/RTI team and monitors their attendance. |
|
|
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The percentage of students scoring proficient in grades K, 1 and 2 on the Florida Assessment of Student Thinking (FAST) STAR Reading Assessment will increase from 65% on Spring 2024 progress monitoring (PM) 3 to 70% by June 2026 as measured by the FAST PM 3 scores for STAR Reading. | All teachers will be trained by BCPS in the Science of Reading to best implemet Florida's Formula for Success. Teachers will continue to take courses to become reading endorsed. | $0.00 | Administration and Support Staff work closely with classroom teachers. | ||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||
The measures used to determine progress toward our schoolwide goals include FAST PM2 data along with i-Ready Diagnostic 2 results. We have analyzed the most recent data to identify priority instructional goals, as these scores serve as a strong predictor of FAST PM3 performance. Our desired outcome is for all students to perform at or above proficiency in ELA. Specifically, our schoolwide goal is to increase overall Reading proficiency by 7%, moving from 63% to 70%. We anticipate continued student growth on the FAST assessment by the end of the school year. To monitor progress, we conduct monthly STAR Reading assessments. Our most recent STAR testing cycle indicates that students are trending positively toward meeting our Reading goals. At the mid-year point, our data shows 42% mastery in Reading across grades K through 2. For comparison, our overall mastery rate was 63% at PM3 during the 2024–2025 school year. While we recognize there is still work to be done, current data trends demonstrate positive growth toward end-of-year expectations. To maintain momentum and close existing achievement gaps, we are implementing targeted interventions. We are using i-Ready Diagnostic 2 and PM2 data to identify the lowest-performing standards and are forming small-group remediation and reteach sessions to address these areas. Additionally, our WIN (What I Need) intervention blocks have been restructured based on the most recent data. These groups now focus specifically on the weakest standards to ensure intervention time is intentional, focused, and high-impact. We remain confident that through consistent progress monitoring and the continued refinement of Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions, we will meet our proficiency goals by the end of the school year. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| To improve outcomes for our lowest-performing subgroups, including English Language Learners (ELLs) and Students with Disabilities (SWD), we have implemented targeted and intentional supports. For students with limited English proficiency, ESOL pull-out groups have been established to support our growing Russian, Ukrainian, and Spanish-speaking populations. These groups are supported by a dedicated native language-speaking paraprofessional, allowing students to develop English language skills while also receiving assistance in their primary language. In addition to ESOL services, students are supported through Imagine Learning, ELLevation, i-Ready, Benchmark Advance, and Magnetic Reading to strengthen language acquisition and comprehension. For students who continue to experience academic challenges, the Response to Intervention (RTI) team meets weekly to identify barriers to success and implement high-quality, research-based interventions supported by instructional staff. Weekly collaborative team meetings also support horizontal alignment of standards and instructional planning. Student progress is continuously monitored through lesson completion data and targeted small-group remediation. For Students with Disabilities, the ESE team provides structured literacy interventions through Orton-Gillingham-based programs, including SIPPs and UFLI. These multi-sensory approaches are designed to address individual learning needs and improve foundational literacy skills. To further identify student strengths and areas of need, we are utilizing i-Ready Diagnostic 2 data to determine the lowest-performing standards and strengths. Teachers have used this data to form targeted small-group remediation and reteach sessions. Additionally, our intervention block (WIN – What I Need) has been restructured based on recent assessment data to focus exclusively on the most critical skill deficits, ensuring intervention time is purposeful and impactful. Based on the positive growth trajectories identified in our mid-year STAR and FAST PM2 data, we remain confident that our targeted refinements to Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions will bridge remaining gaps. By maintaining this rigorous focus on standard-specific mastery, we are well-positioned to meet our 70% proficiency goal and maximize student achievement by the end of the school year. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Based on the most recent STAR Progress Monitoring data and PM2 results, we have reevaluated student placement in remediation pull-out groups for grades K-2. These groups are supported by an intervention teacher and are designed to prioritize students with the greatest academic needs. Students who demonstrate mastery of specific standards on STAR assessments transition to enrichment or alternative skill-based groups. Students who continue to struggle receive intensified small-group instruction using varied instructional modalities, such as hands-on manipulatives and leveled texts. Additionally, we are utilizing the i-Ready Teacher Toolbox and state-released assessment items to support reteach and spiral review instruction. These targeted reviews emphasize test-taking strategies and comprehension using authentic texts, allowing for reinforcement of multiple reading standards simultaneously. To further strengthen instructional effectiveness, teachers are participating in deep lesson planning training focused on enhancing grade-level instruction and implementing more intentional and rigorous checks for understanding. Regular data chats with teachers will continue, and administration and support staff will collaborate closely with classroom teachers through data analysis, review of student work samples, and frequent classroom walkthroughs and observations. Our school will continue using monthly STAR Progress Monitoring and FAST assessment data to guide instructional decisions in Reading. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The percentage of students scoring proficient in grades 3, 4, and 5 on the Florida Assessment of Student Thinking (FAST) in Mathematics will increase from 73% on Spring 2025 progress monitoring (PM) 3 to 75% by June 2026 as measured by the FAST PM 3 scores for Mathematics. | Professional Development will take place around the continued implementation of Savaas enVision for high-quality tier 1 instruction. All teachers will participate in the pilot Scaling Up Math Critical Content training provided by the district's elementary learning math department. | $0.00 | Monitoring: Administration and Support Staff work closely with classroom teachers. Teams engage in data chats, professional learning communities, classroom walkthroughs, and observations. Data is closely tracked through screenings, progress monitoring, diagnostic, and summative assessments to drive instruction, remediation, and enrichment. | ||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| The measures we used to determine if we are meeting our school wide goals were based off our FAST PM 2 Math data and our iReady Diagnostic 2 scores. We analyzed the results of the second i-Ready diagnostic to determine instructional goals to focus on as we feel iReady D2 scores are a strong indicator of PM3 scores. Our desired state is to have all students at or above proficiency level in ELA. Our specific goal is to increase from 73% on Spring 2025 progress monitoring (PM) 3 to 75% by June 2026 as measured by the FAST PM 3 scores for Mathematics. We expect students to increase their proficiency on the FAST exams at the end of the school year. Our progress monitoring will continue with monthly STAR tests in the areas of Math. Based on our most recent data we are tracking at 40% mastery in Grades 3 through 5 in Math at our mid year point. We were overall at 72% mastery at PM3 last year in 24-25. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||
Based on the most recent STAR Progress Monitoring data, we have reevaluated student placement in remediation pull-out groups and prioritized students demonstrating the greatest academic need. In addition, we are expanding support by targeting mathematics intervention for students in the lowest quartile across grades 3–5. To strengthen instructional support, our instructional coach will provide assistance within departmentalized 3-5 grade math classrooms to facilitate both enrichment and intervention groups. We are also increasing the frequency of math-focused PLC meetings and collaborating closely with the Math Department to identify and implement additional instructional resources and strategies. To further enhance core instruction, staff will participate in deep lesson planning professional development focused on strengthening grade-level instruction and improving the implementation of effective checks for understanding. We will continue to conduct regular data chats with teachers to monitor student progress. Administration and support staff will work collaboratively with classroom teachers through ongoing data discussions, analysis of student work, and consistent classroom walkthroughs and observations. Our school will continue to use STAR Progress Monitoring data in mathematics to guide instructional decision-making and measure progress toward our schoolwide goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||
To improve outcomes for our low-performing subgroups, including English Language Learners (ELLs) and Students with Disabilities (SWD), we have implemented targeted instructional supports and intervention systems. For students with limited English proficiency, we have established ESOL pull-out groups to support our large Russian, Ukrainian, and Spanish-speaking populations. We have also assigned a native language-speaking ESP to support these groups, allowing students to develop English language skills while receiving assistance from an adult who can provide native language support when needed. In addition to pull-out services, ELL students utilize Imagine Learning within their general education classrooms, along with ELLevation lesson plans and i-Ready Math lessons to support language development and content mastery. ELL students also use the i-Ready Math Toolbox and enVision MDIS Blackbox resources to strengthen both mathematical understanding and English language acquisition. For students requiring additional support, our Response to Intervention (RTI) team meets weekly to identify barriers to student success and implement high-quality, research-based interventions. These supports include targeted small-group instruction and teaching assistance to reinforce skill development. Grade-level teams also participate in weekly horizontal planning meetings to ensure alignment of standards and instructional strategies. Student progress is continuously monitored through lesson completion data and small-group remediation outcomes. For our SWD population, the ESE team provides math remediation using multisensory instructional strategies. Instruction is supported through the Elementary Learning Department’s lesson guides and the Savvas MDIS Blackbox resource to provide structured and differentiated support. Through these intentional supports and ongoing progress monitoring, we are confident that we will continue to see improvement in achievement among our low-performing subgroups. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The percentage of students scoring proficient in grades 3-5 on the Florida Assessment of Student Thinking (FAST) in English Language Arts (ELA) will increase from 75% on Spring 2025 progress monitoring (PM) 3 to 79% by June 2026 as measured by the FAST PM 3 scores for English Language Arts. | All teachers will be trained by BCPS in the Science of Reading to best implement Florida's Formula for Success. Teachers will continue to take courses to become reading endorsed. | $0.00 | Administration and Support Staff work closely with classroom teachers. Teams engage in data chats, professional learning communities, classroom walkthroughs, and observations. Data is closely tracked through screenings, progress monitoring, diagnostics, and summative assessments to drive instruction, remediation, and enrichment. | ||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||
The measures used to determine progress toward our schoolwide goals include FAST PM2 data along with i-Ready Diagnostic 2 results. We have analyzed the most recent data to identify priority instructional goals, as these scores serve as a strong predictor of FAST PM3 performance. Our desired outcome is for all students to perform at or above proficiency in ELA. We anticipate continued student growth on the FAST assessment by the end of the school year. To monitor progress, we conduct monthly STAR Reading assessments. Our most recent STAR testing cycle indicates that students are trending positively toward meeting our Reading goals. At the mid-year point, our data shows 52% mastery in Reading across grades 3 through 5. For comparison, our overall mastery rate was 71% at PM3 during the 2024–2025 school year. While we recognize there is still work to be done, current data trends demonstrate positive growth toward end-of-year expectations. To maintain momentum and close existing achievement gaps, we are implementing targeted interventions. We are using i-Ready Diagnostic 2 and PM2 data to identify the lowest-performing standards and are forming small-group remediation and reteach sessions to address these areas. Additionally, our WIN (What I Need) intervention blocks have been restructured based on the most recent data. These groups now focus specifically on the weakest standards to ensure intervention time is intentional, focused, and high-impact. We remain confident that through consistent progress monitoring and the continued refinement of Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions, we will meet our proficiency goals by the end of the school year. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| To improve outcomes for our lowest-performing subgroups, including English Language Learners (ELLs) and Students with Disabilities (SWD), we have implemented targeted and intentional supports. For students with limited English proficiency, ESOL pull-out groups have been established to support our growing Russian, Ukrainian, and Spanish-speaking populations. These groups are supported by a dedicated native language-speaking paraprofessional, allowing students to develop English language skills while also receiving assistance in their primary language. In addition to ESOL services, students are supported through Imagine Learning, ELLevation, i-Ready, Benchmark Advance, and Magnetic Reading to strengthen language acquisition and comprehension. For students who continue to experience academic challenges, the Response to Intervention (RTI) team meets weekly to identify barriers to success and implement high-quality, research-based interventions supported by instructional staff. Weekly collaborative team meetings also support horizontal alignment of standards and instructional planning. Student progress is continuously monitored through lesson completion data and targeted small-group remediation. For Students with Disabilities, the ESE team provides structured literacy interventions through Orton-Gillingham-based programs, including SIPPs and UFLI. These multi-sensory approaches are designed to address individual learning needs and improve foundational literacy skills. To further identify student strengths and areas of need, we are utilizing i-Ready Diagnostic 2 data to determine the lowest-performing standards and strengths. Teachers have used this data to form targeted small-group remediation and reteach sessions. Additionally, our intervention block (WIN – What I Need) has been restructured based on recent assessment data to focus exclusively on the most critical skill deficits, ensuring intervention time is purposeful and impactful. Based on the positive growth trajectories identified in our mid-year STAR and FAST PM2 data, we remain confident that our targeted refinements to Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions will bridge remaining gaps. By maintaining this rigorous focus on standard-specific mastery, we are well-positioned to meet our 75% proficiency goal and maximize student achievement by the end of the school year |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Based on the most recent STAR Progress Monitoring data and PM2 results, we have reevaluated student placement in remediation pull-out groups for grades 3-5. These groups are supported by an intervention teacher and are designed to prioritize students with the greatest academic needs. Students who demonstrate mastery of specific standards on STAR assessments transition to enrichment or alternative skill-based groups. Students who continue to struggle receive intensified small-group instruction using varied instructional modalities, such as hands-on manipulatives and leveled texts. Additionally, we are utilizing the i-Ready Teacher Toolbox and state-released assessment items to support reteach and spiral review instruction. These targeted reviews emphasize test-taking strategies and comprehension using authentic texts, allowing for reinforcement of multiple reading standards simultaneously. To further strengthen instructional effectiveness, teachers are participating in deep lesson planning training focused on enhancing grade-level instruction and implementing more intentional and rigorous checks for understanding. Regular data chats with teachers will continue, and administration and support staff will collaborate closely with classroom teachers through data analysis, review of student work samples, and frequent classroom walkthroughs and observations. Our school will continue using monthly STAR Progress Monitoring and FAST assessment data to guide instructional decisions in Reading. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 25-26-CERP-K-12-Reading-Signin_Agend_Habordale.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/12/2025 |
| 9997_08022025_2526_SIP-K12-CERP-Literacy-Leadership-Contact-Information.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/18/2025 |
PLC Meeting Schedule
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Spring_25_Broward_Harbordale-Elementary-School_SAM_Dashboard.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/11/2025 |
| MTSS-Action-Plan-Harbordale-25-26-Final.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/11/2025 |
| SAM-Report-Action-Plan.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/12/2025 |
| Spring_25_Broward_Harbordale-Elementary-School_SAM_Dashboard.pdf | Lauren Gordon | 9/12/2025 |
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
|
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SPBP-25-26.pdf | Lauren Gordon | 4/28/2025 |
| Harbordale-ES-SPBP-Feedback-Form-2025-2026-B.pdf | CHAVIS JAVON YOUNGBLOOD | 5/23/2025 |
| 0491_04282025_PBIS-Self-Assessment-Survey---Harbordale-ES.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/18/2025 |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Grade Level | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Attendance Type | School Goal |
|---|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 25-26-Attendance-Plan.pdf | Lauren Gordon | 9/11/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| ASCP_2025.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/12/2025 |
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Harbordale-BPIE.pdf | Lauren Gordon | 1/26/2026 |
SAC Upload Center
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SurveysReportPrint4207239567193987620.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/11/2025 |
| SurveysReportPrint7188838599530781428.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/11/2025 |
| SurveysReportPrint1525782281330766114.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/11/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Parent-Resource-Picture.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 9/12/2025 |
| FACE-Pictures-3-10-30-25.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 10/30/2025 |
| FACE-Pictures-2-10-30-25.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 10/30/2025 |
| FACE-Pictures-10-30-25.pdf | Jennifer Kashdin | 10/30/2025 |