| School Name | Lauderdale Lakes MS (1701) | School Grade (2025 - 2026) | C |
| Title 1 School | Yes | School Improvement (SI) | No |
| School of Excellence | No | ESSA School | No |
|
RAISE
Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence |
No | ||
| SAC Documentation/SAC Upload Center |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-2027-School-Budget.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/1/2026 |
|
Using the data below, describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system. In accordance with State Board Rule 6A-6.053, the school ensures that all students receive high-quality, standards-based instruction through the implementation of a comprehensive Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS). The school's instructional framework is designed to provide systematic, explicit, and evidence-based instruction aligned to the Florida Benchmarks for Excellent Student Thinking (B.E.S.T.) Standards. Instructional decisions are driven by multiple sources of student data, including FAST progress monitoring assessments, statewide assessments, district benchmark assessments, classroom formative assessments, attendance records, behavior reports, and Early Warning System (EWS) indicators. The principal, assistant principals, instructional coaches, school counselors, MTSS leadership team, Exceptional Student Education (ESE) specialists, ESOL teachers, school psychologist, social worker, and classroom teachers collaborate regularly to analyze student performance data and identify students requiring additional academic, behavioral, or social-emotional support. Data review meetings occur throughout the school year to monitor student progress, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and make timely adjustments to instructional plans. Based on the school's Early Warning System data, targeted interventions are provided to students demonstrating chronic absenteeism, excessive disciplinary referrals or suspensions, low academic achievement, reading deficiencies, mathematics deficiencies, and students exhibiting multiple early warning indicators. Academic InterventionsStudents performing below grade-level expectations receive evidence-based interventions designed to accelerate learning while addressing individual skill deficits. Reading Interventions Students identified with substantial reading deficiencies or Level 1 performance on statewide ELA assessments participate in intensive reading instruction utilizing research-based literacy practices that emphasize:
Intervention schedules are developed to ensure students receive additional instructional time beyond the core reading block. Reading interventionists and classroom teachers collaborate to monitor student growth and adjust instructional strategies as needed. Mathematics InterventionsStudents identified as performing below proficiency in mathematics receive targeted intervention focused on closing foundational skill gaps through:
Teachers use benchmark and classroom assessment data to provide just-in-time interventions and adjust pacing based on student performance. Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)The school implements a structured MTSS framework to provide increasingly intensive interventions based on student need. Tier I
Tier II
Tier III
Student intervention plans are reviewed routinely by the MTSS team to ensure interventions are producing measurable gains. Attendance Improvement StrategiesWith over 300 students identified as chronically absent, improving attendance remains a schoolwide priority. The school utilizes a proactive attendance monitoring system that identifies attendance concerns early and provides tiered supports before absenteeism becomes chronic. Attendance interventions include:
The leadership team reviews attendance data weekly to identify trends and provide timely interventions. Behavioral and Social-Emotional SupportsTo reduce suspensions and improve school climate, the school implements Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) as a schoolwide framework for promoting positive student behavior. Behavioral interventions include:
The school monitors discipline data regularly to identify disproportionality and ensure equitable implementation of disciplinary practices. Students with Multiple Early Warning IndicatorsStudents identified with two or more Early Warning Indicators receive comprehensive case management through the MTSS process. These students are prioritized for intensive intervention because they demonstrate multiple risk factors associated with academic failure. Support plans may include:
The MTSS leadership team reviews these students frequently to evaluate intervention effectiveness and modify supports as needed. Progress Monitoring and Data AnalysisContinuous progress monitoring is a critical component of the school's instructional improvement process. Teachers administer formative assessments, district benchmarks, FAST Progress Monitoring assessments, and classroom performance tasks throughout the school year to evaluate student growth. Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) meet regularly to:
Instructional coaches support teachers through classroom observations, modeling research-based instructional practices, collaborative planning, and professional development focused on improving student outcomes. Family and Community EngagementThe school recognizes that strong partnerships with families significantly contribute to student success. Parents and guardians are actively engaged throughout the intervention process through:
Families are encouraged to participate in decision-making regarding intervention plans and student goal setting. Professional LearningTeachers and instructional staff participate in ongoing professional learning focused on:
Professional development is aligned to school improvement goals and informed by student performance data. Continuous ImprovementSchool leadership conducts ongoing classroom walkthroughs, instructional observations, and data reviews to ensure that evidence-based instructional practices are implemented with fidelity. The School Improvement Team evaluates the effectiveness of interventions each grading period using attendance, behavior, academic achievement, progress monitoring data, and statewide assessment results. By implementing a comprehensive system of evidence-based instruction, continuous progress monitoring, collaborative problem-solving, and targeted academic and behavioral interventions, the school is committed to improving outcomes for all students identified through the Early Warning System. These coordinated efforts ensure that students receive the individualized support necessary to increase academic achievement, improve attendance, reduce disciplinary incidents, strengthen literacy and mathematics proficiency, and prepare all students for long-term academic success. |
|
|
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The percentage of students making learning gains in grades 6–8 will increase from 53% to 60% by the end of May 2027, as measured by the FAST PM3 Assessment. | Explicit Instruction Using the CRA Model | The Mathematics Area of Focus will be monitored through regular analysis of FAST Progress Monitoring, district benchmark, common formative, and classroom assessment data. Mathematics PLCs will meet weekly to review student progress, identify learning gaps, monitor the effectiveness of small-group instruction and interventions, and adjust instructional plans as needed. Administrators and the instructional coach will conduct classroom walkthroughs to monitor the implementation of the CRA instructional model, Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning (MTR) Standards, and data-driven instructional practices. Student performance data and instructional evidence will be used to ensure the school remains on track to increase overall learning gains from 53% to 60% and improve learning gains for students in the Lowest Quartile. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The percentage of ELA/Reading students making learning gains in grades 6-8 will increase from 55% to 65% by the end of May 2027 as measured by the FAST PM3 assessment. | The ELA/Reading Area of Focus will be monitored through ongoing analysis of student achievement data and instructional implementation. FAST Progress Monitoring (PM1, PM2, and PM3), district benchmark assessments, and common formative assessment data will be reviewed during weekly Professional Learning Community (PLC) meetings to identify student learning trends, adjust small-group instruction, and plan targeted interventions. School administrators and instructional coaches will conduct regular classroom walkthroughs to monitor the implementation of explicit reading comprehension strategies and the effectiveness of differentiated small-group instruction. PLC agendas, student work samples, walkthrough feedback, and progress-monitoring data will be used to evaluate the impact of instructional practices and make timely adjustments to ensure students remain on track to achieve the goal of increasing learning gains from 55% to 65% on the FAST PM3 assessment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| LLMS-Title-1-Addendum-26-27.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/7/2026 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| LLMS_SIP-CERP-Literacy-Leadership-Team-Contact-Information-26-27.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/7/2026 |
PLC Meeting Schedule
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Lauderdale-Lakes-Middle-MTSS-Action-Plan-26-27-.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/7/2026 |
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
|
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SPBP-LLMS-2026-27.pdf | Jay Sohn | 4/10/2026 |
| Lauderdale-Lakes-MS-REVIEW-TEAM-5-SPBP-Feedback-Form-2026-2027.pdf | Chandra Evans | 5/19/2026 |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Grade Level | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Attendance Type | School Goal |
|---|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SIP-Attendance-Plan-26-27.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/1/2026 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| ASCP-2026-2027.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 8/21/2026 |
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1701-SBPIE-25-26.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/7/2026 |
SAC Upload Center
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| BCPS-Customer-Service-Survey-Staff-2026.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/8/2026 |
| BCPS-Customer-Service-Survey-Parent-2026.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/8/2026 |
| BCPS-Customer-Service-Survey-Student-2026.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/8/2026 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Lauderdale-Lakes-Middle_FACE_SPACE_September-2026.pdf | Latavia Pinckney | 9/8/2026 |