| School Name | Riverglades ES (2891) | School Grade (2024 - 2025) | |
| Title 1 School | No | School Improvement (SI) | No |
| School of Excellence | Yes | ESSA School | No |
|
RAISE
Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence |
No | ||
| SAC Documentation/SAC Upload Center |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Executive-Summary-Cognia.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/22/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Budget.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 5/19/2025 |
|
Using the data below, describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system. A variety of intervention strategies are employed by our school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system. First of all, students who are identified by the early warning system are given immediate and intensive instruction as a form of intervention based on their academic needs. This instruction is designed to address the gaps and reduce barriers to students’ ability to meet Tier 1 expectations. These interventions are aligned to the grade level standards and also target foundational skills that are focused on meeting the individual needs of the students. Tier 2 and 3 students are given allotted time in addition to core instruction for small group instruction in the classroom and in pull-out/push-in settings when applicable. Additionally, Tier 3 instruction is delivered by teachers who are reading endorsed. Furthermore, teachers utilize research-based programs such as Leveled Literacy Intervention, Heggerty and Reading Horizons to provide systematic, explicit instruction to address the gaps and the individual levels of the students. Students participate in the WIN (What I Need) Intervention Block daily for 30 minutes. During this time, students in Tier 2 and 3 will meet with the teacher for small group instruction focused on their reading deficiency. Teacher are utilizing grade level appropriate interventions such as Bechmark Phonics Intervention, i-Ready Intervention lessons, Wordly Wise, etc. When applicable, instruction includes accommodations as documented in the IEP, ESOL or 504 documents and plans. Students are given access to Imagine Learning for ELL students. A frequent progress monitoring process is in place using Benchmark Advanced program-embedded assessments, checklists, unit assessments, reading records, and i-Ready Reading. In mathematics, a frequent progress monitoring process is in place using enVision topic assessments, cumulative assessments, and i-Ready Reading. |
|
|
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By June of 2025 the percentage of students in grades K-2 demonstrating proficiency in ELA will increase from 73% to 75% on the STAR as evidenced by the 3rd administration of the FAST. | Training in Performance Matters to monitor student progress | $4,000.00 | Data Chats and progress monitoring and classroom visits by administration and support staff. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
During the Fall semester, the school encountered implementation challenges related to this goal due to students’ insufficient development of foundational phonics skills. Student performance data, classroom observations, and progress monitoring indicated that many students demonstrated gaps in phoneme-grapheme correspondence, decoding accuracy, and the application of phonics strategies during reading tasks. These foundational skill deficits impacted students’ reading fluency and overall literacy development, limiting their ability to fully access grade-level text and instruction. To address this need, the school implemented targeted professional development for instructional staff on the University of Florida Literacy Institute (UFLI) Foundations program. This training focused on strengthening teachers’ capacity to deliver explicit, systematic, and research-based phonics instruction aligned with evidence-based literacy practices. Teachers were trained in lesson structure, modeling strategies, guided practice, corrective feedback, and progress monitoring to ensure effective and consistent implementation. Following professional development, teachers began implementing UFLI Foundations with fidelity to provide structured, daily phonics instruction. This initiative is intended to improve students’ decoding skills, increase reading fluency, and strengthen overall literacy outcomes. School leadership and instructional coaches will continue to monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs, student progress monitoring data, and ongoing coaching support to ensure effective instructional practices and continued progress toward the established school improvement goal. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The school’s intervention strategies demonstrated several strengths, particularly through the implementation of the Heggerty Phonemic Awareness curriculum and the University of Florida Literacy Institute (UFLI) Foundations program. Heggerty provided students with daily, structured phonemic awareness instruction, supporting the development of critical foundational skills such as phoneme segmentation, blending, and manipulation. This strengthened students’ auditory processing abilities and prepared them to more effectively engage in phonics instruction. In addition, the implementation of UFLI Foundations provided systematic and explicit phonics instruction, allowing students to develop stronger decoding skills, improve reading accuracy, and build overall reading fluency. Together, these evidence-based programs created a comprehensive approach to strengthening foundational literacy skills. Additionally, teachers received professional development on the Performance Matters platform to strengthen data-driven instructional practices. The purpose of this training was to build teachers’ capacity to analyze student performance data, identify skill deficits, and make informed instructional decisions. Through this process, teachers were able to use assessment data to monitor student progress, adjust instruction, and implement targeted interventions aligned to student needs. This focus on data analysis supported more responsive and differentiated instruction, ensuring that interventions were aligned with individual student learning gaps and contributing to improved literacy outcomes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To accomplish the intended outcome for this goal, additional actions are needed to expand targeted small group instruction focused on foundational literacy skills. The school will create additional small instructional groups supported by support staff to implement the UFLI Foundations program with greater intensity and frequency. This approach will allow for more individualized and differentiated instruction, ensuring that students with identified phonics deficits receive focused, explicit, and systematic support aligned to their specific needs. By utilizing support staff to facilitate these small groups, the school will increase instructional time dedicated to phonics intervention and reduce student-to-teacher ratios, allowing for more immediate corrective feedback, guided practice, and progress monitoring. This targeted intervention structure will support accelerated skill development in decoding, word recognition, and reading fluency. School leadership will continue to monitor the effectiveness of these small group interventions through ongoing data analysis, progress monitoring, and classroom observations to ensure fidelity of UFLI implementation and to make necessary instructional adjustments. This action will strengthen the school’s capacity to provide timely, data-driven interventions and support progress toward achieving the established literacy goal. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By June of 2026, students in grades 3-5 scoring a Level 3 or higher will increase by 2% as evidemced by the scores on FAST PM3 ELA | Training in Performance Matters to monitor student progress | $4,000.00 | Data Chats, progress monitoring, classroom walkthroughs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
During the Fall semester, the school encountered implementation challenges related to insufficient structured instructional time to fully address student learning needs aligned to this goal. Limitations in protected, dedicated instructional blocks impacted the school’s ability to provide consistent, targeted, and data-driven instruction and interventions. As a result, some students did not receive the level of differentiated support and intervention necessary to address identified skill gaps and accelerate academic progress. To address this challenge, the school provided professional development to teachers on the Performance Matters data platform. This training focused on strengthening teachers’ ability to effectively analyze student performance data, identify specific areas of need, and use that information to inform instructional planning. Teachers were trained to review assessment results, monitor student progress, and identify trends at the individual, small group, and whole-class levels. The use of Performance Matters will enable teachers to make data-driven instructional decisions and tailor instruction to meet the specific needs of their students. This includes adjusting pacing, implementing targeted small group instruction, and providing focused interventions based on identified skill deficits. By strengthening the use of data to guide instruction, the school will improve the effectiveness of instructional time and ensure that all students receive appropriate support aligned to the school’s improvement goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The intervention strategies demonstrated strength in that the programs and instructional practices implemented were grounded in research-based, evidence-based methodologies. The school utilized interventions with a proven record of effectiveness in supporting student learning and improving foundational literacy skills. These research-based interventions provided structured, systematic, and explicit instruction aligned with best practices in literacy development. The use of evidence-based programs ensured consistency in instructional delivery and supported the development of critical skills such as phonemic awareness, phonics, decoding, and reading fluency. Additionally, these interventions included built-in progress monitoring components, allowing teachers to regularly assess student growth and adjust instruction as needed. By implementing research-based intervention strategies, the school strengthened its ability to provide targeted, effective support to students performing below grade level. This approach ensured that instructional decisions were aligned with scientifically supported practices, increasing the likelihood of improved student outcomes and progress toward achieving the school’s improvement goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To accomplish the intended outcome for this specific goal, the school will restructure What I Need (WIN) groups to more effectively target identified student learning needs. WIN groups will be reorganized based on current student performance data, including assessment results, progress monitoring, and classroom performance, to ensure that students receive instruction aligned to their specific skill deficits. This restructuring will allow teachers and support staff to provide more focused, differentiated instruction in smaller, skill-based groups. Instruction within WIN groups will prioritize foundational skill development, including phonics, fluency, and comprehension, depending on individual student needs. The use of data to form and adjust WIN groups will ensure that instruction remains responsive and targeted, allowing for timely interventions and support. Additionally, WIN group effectiveness will be monitored regularly through ongoing data analysis and progress monitoring. Adjustments to group placement and instructional strategies will be made as needed to ensure continued student growth. This action will strengthen the school’s tiered system of supports and improve the effectiveness of intervention efforts, contributing to progress toward achieving the school’s improvement goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| CERP-SIGN-IN_RGE.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/25/2025 |
| CERP_RGE.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/25/2025 |
| CERP-Agenda_RGE.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/30/2025 |
| CERP_RGE.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/30/2025 |
PLC Meeting Schedule
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Spring_25_SAM_Dashboard_Riverglades.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/22/2025 |
| MTSS-Action-Plan.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/22/2025 |
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
|
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SPBP-Riverglades.pdf | Vonda Palmer-Carter | 5/14/2025 |
| RivergladesESSPBP-Feedback-Form-2025-2026.pdf | Meghan Nowell | 5/22/2025 |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Grade Level | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Attendance Type | School Goal |
|---|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance-Plan.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/22/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| ASCSP.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/22/2025 |
| LSW-Action-Plan.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/22/2025 |
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| BPIE.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/20/2025 |
SAC Upload Center
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| RGE-Customer-Surveys-2025.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/29/2025 |
| RGE-Student-Survey-2025.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/29/2025 |
| RGE-Staff-Survey-2025.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/29/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| FACE-Plan.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 9/29/2025 |
| FACE-Plan-OCT.pdf | Stephanie Rodriguez | 10/27/2025 |