| School Name | Sunset Lakes ES (3661) | School Grade (2024 - 2025) | |
| Title 1 School | No | School Improvement (SI) | No |
| School of Excellence | Yes | ESSA School | No |
|
RAISE
Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence |
No | ||
| SAC Documentation/SAC Upload Center |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Cognia-Executive-Summary-Sunset_Lakes.pdf | Jennifer Alberti | 9/12/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 3661-Sunset-Lakes-Elementary-Budget-25-26.pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 9/26/2025 |
|
Using the data below, describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system. The support staff team meets to consult which interventions will meet the individual needs of the students based on various screeners. Reading intervention programs address the needs of K-5 students struggling in multiple areas of reading. Heggerty, Magnetics, and UFLI addresses phonological awareness, phonics, word studies, and high frequency words. Concepts are taught in depth with separate instructional tracks in grades K-3. Benchmark Advance interventions will be used for students in grades K-5 who would benefit from additional core instruction outside of Tier 1 instruction. Savvas Realize Reteach (MDIS) interventions will be used for students in grades K-5 who would benefit from additional core instruction outside of Tier 1 instruction. i-Ready Fluency Flight and students i-Ready pathways are utilized to increase math fluency. |
|
|
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May 2026, Sunset Lakes Elementary will increase overall mathematics proficiency in Grades 3-5 from 81% to 84% according to the mathematics Florida Assessment of Student Thinking (FAST). | Small Group PD and Academic Discourse PD | Support staff and teachers will use various methods of data to keep track of student learning. Small group instruction using the MDIS lessons are essential because it provides teachers with the opportunity to reteach and remediate certain lessons to students. Analyzing FAST Math PM1 and PM2 data is essential since it allows support staff and teachers to make data driven decisions that best support the needs of students. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
During the Fall semester, Sunset Lakes Elementary encountered several implementation challenges that impacted mathematics instruction in Grades 3–5. Data chats with teachers indicated inconsistent implementation of math instructional strategies across classrooms. Teachers reported limited instructional time due to schedule interruptions. To address these challenges, the school adjusted the instructional schedule to protect uninterrupted math blocks and implemented consistent schoolwide targeted interventions for all learners within the whole and small group setting. Instructional coaching and collaborative planning time were also increased to ensure greater fidelity of implementation and alignment across grade levels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Data Driven Small Group Instruction Strengths: Small groups allowed teachers to target specific skill gaps identified through FAST progress monitoring and classroom assessments, and quick checks. Students receiving targeted support using MDIS lessons. Weaknesses: Implementation varied by classroom due to time constraints and instructional demands, resulting in uneven frequency and duration of small-group instruction. Frequent admin walkthroughs have been put in place to ensure research based intervention strategies are being utilized. FAST-Aligned Curriculum- Savvas Strengths: Instruction aligned to Florida B.E.S.T. standards increased student exposure to grade-level content. Teachers consistently implemented whole-group lessons using district-approved resources and materials. Weaknesses: Inconsistent pacing in certain grade levels made it challenging to meet the needs of students. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus in mathematics, Sunset Lakes Elementary will implement several new actions. The school established a protected, uninterrupted mathematics block across Grades 3–5 to ensure consistent instructional time is occurring daily for all students. Support Staff and administrators will conduct regular walkthroughs focused on aligned math instructional resources that have been researched to ensure students are receiving high quality instruction provide timely feedback to teachers. Additionally, the school will expand targeted intervention supports by monitoring data and increasing the frequency of Tier 2 and Tier 3 intervention sessions. Professional development will be enhanced to include explicit training on differentiation, small-group instruction, and effective use of FAST data to inform instruction. Grade-level teams will also engage in structured PLC's with clear agendas focused on data analysis, instructional planning, and monitoring student progress to ensure fidelity and consistency across classrooms. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May 2026, Sunset Lakes Elementary will increase overall ELA proficiency in Grades 3-5 from 76% to 79% according to the English Language Arts (ELA) Florida Assessment of Student Thinking (FAST). | Small Group PD and Academic Discourse PD | Support staff and teachers will monitor Benchmark Unit Assessments within our school wide data spreadsheet. Teachers will form small groups based on students i-Ready Diagnostic and FAST data to meet the needs of learners within the classroom. Teachers and support staff monitor data to make any necessary changes in order to meet the diverse needs of learners. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
During the Fall semester, Sunset Lakes Elementary experienced several implementation challenges impacting ELA instruction in Grades 3–5. Data chats from FAST progress monitoring and classroom assessments revealed gaps in certain standards across grade levels. Targeted feedback and resources were provided by the Literacy Coach to support FAST-aligned standards. The effective use of data to guide small-group instruction was critical to ensure gaps start closing. Instructional coaches increased support through common planning modeling to focus on analyzing FAST data, planning targeted instruction, and monitoring student progress to improve consistency and instructional effectiveness across grade levels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 2 and Tier 3 Students Strengths: Intervention programs provided explicit, systematic instruction in decoding, fluency, and comprehension for struggling readers. Progress monitoring data showed improvement for students receiving consistent intervention support. Weaknesses: Some teachers were providing services inconsistent or not using the correct research based resource. PLC's Strengths: PLCs supported collaborative planning, analysis of FAST data, and sharing of instructional strategies aligned to ELA standards. Weaknesses: PLC effectiveness was impacted by some teachers not understanding how to align the instructional strategies to lessons. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To accomplish the intended outcome for the ELA Area of Focus, Sunset Lakes Elementary will implement several new actions. Instructional coaches and administrators will conduct regular classroom walkthroughs focused on FAST-aligned ELA instruction, text-based questioning, and student written responses, providing timely feedback and support. Additionally, the school will strengthen data-driven small-group instruction by refining student placement using FAST progress monitoring and increasing the frequency and intensity of Tier 2 and Tier 3 literacy interventions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May 2026, Sunset Lakes Elementary will increase overall ELA proficiency in Grades K-2 from 70% to 73% according to the STAR Assessment. | Small Group PD and Academic Discourse PD | Support staff and teachers will use various methods of data to evaluate student learning. Teachers will be monitoring Benchmark Advanced Unit Assessment data to see the needs of each student. Teachers will form targeted small groups to be able to reach all students needs. Support staff will meet to analyze STAR PM1 and PM2 data to better meet the needs of all students to make data driven decisions based off the data to support student learning. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| During the Fall semester, Sunset Lakes Elementary encountered several implementation challenges impacting ELA instruction in Grades K–2. STAR assessment data and classroom observations indicated gaps in foundational literacy skills, including phonemic awareness, phonics, and early reading fluency. Inconsistent implementation of evidence-based literacy routines, such as explicit phonics instruction and progress monitoring, was also observed across classrooms.
Targeted professional development was provided to strengthen explicit, systematic instruction in phonemic awareness and phonics aligned to student needs identified through STAR data. Instructional coaches increased classroom modeling and feedback cycles to support fidelity of implementation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Phonics & Phonemic Awareness Instruction Strengths: Explicit instruction in phonics and phonemic awareness improved students’ foundational reading skills and supported early reading fluency. Consistent routines increased exposure to grade-level literacy skills. Weaknesses: Implementation varied across classrooms, with some students not receiving sufficient differentiation or additional support for below-benchmark skills. Small-Group Reading Instruction Strengths: Small groups allowed teachers to target students’ specific skill deficits identified through STAR assessment, including decoding, fluency, and comprehension. Students in these groups showed measurable growth in foundational literacy skills. Weaknesses: Fluid data caused some students to be moved across various small groups to target remediation standards. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Instructional coaches and administrators will conduct regular classroom walkthroughs focused on fidelity of evidence-based literacy routines, providing timely feedback and modeling best practices. Additionally, the school will expand targeted Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions by using STAR data to refine student grouping and increase the frequency and intensity of support for struggling readers. Professional development will be enhanced to focus on explicit differentiation strategies, small-group instruction, and progress monitoring using STAR data to inform instruction. Grade-level PLCs will engage in structured cycles of data analysis and instructional planning to monitor student growth, address skill gaps, and ensure consistent implementation of literacy strategies across all K–2 classrooms. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Sunset-Lakes-Elementary-SIP-K12-CERP-Literacy-Leadership-Contact-Information.pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 8/27/2025 |
| Sunset-Lakes-Elementary-School-Improvement-Plan-Reading-Team-Agenda.pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 9/26/2025 |
PLC Meeting Schedule
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Spring_25_Broward_Sunset-Lakes-Elementary-School_SAM_Dashboard-(1).pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 8/27/2025 |
| MTSS-Action-Plan-25-26Final.pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 8/28/2025 |
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
|
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Sunset-Lakes-25-26-SPBP.pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 5/14/2025 |
| SUNSET-LAKES-ES-SPBP-Feedback-Form-2025-2026.pdf | Bridgette Howard | 5/22/2025 |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Grade Level | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Attendance Type | School Goal |
|---|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SIP-Attendance-Plan-25-26.pdf | Jennifer Alberti | 9/12/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Annual-School-Counseling-Plan-Sunset-Lakes-Elem..pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 8/28/2025 |
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 3661_09252024_Sunset-Lakes-Elementary-BPIE-24-25.pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 8/27/2025 |
SAC Upload Center |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Sunset-Lakes-Elementary-Parent-Cognia-Survey-24-25.pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 8/11/2025 |
| Sunset-Lakes-Elementary-Staff-Cognia-Survey.pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 8/11/2025 |
| Sunset-Lakes-Elementary-Student-3-5-Cognia-Survey.pdf | Kaitlyn Isenberg | 8/11/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| FACE-bulletin-board.pdf | Jennifer Alberti | 9/12/2025 |