| School Name | Pembroke Lakes ES (2661) | School Grade (2024 - 2025) | |
| Title 1 School | No | School Improvement (SI) | No |
| School of Excellence | Yes | ESSA School | No |
|
RAISE
Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence |
No | ||
| SAC Documentation/SAC Upload Center |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Pembroke-Lakes-Executive-Summary.pdf | Marsha Wagner | 9/8/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-Projection-of-Revenue.pdf | Marsha Wagner | 9/18/2025 |
|
Using the data below, describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system. Phonological Awareness: Tier 2/3 Options: Benchmark Advance PA Interventions (K-5), Heggerty (K-1), Bridge the Gap (2-5) |
|
|
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May 2026, 76% of kindergarten through second grade students will show proficiency in English Language Arts (ELA) as measured by the FAST, compared to 73% during the 24-25 school year. | Science of Reading Implementation | F.A.S.T. Assessment | |||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||
| Implementation challenges encountered in the fall semester was identifying specific areas of need for small group instruction and utilizing resources to address those specific areas. Through Team Leader meetings and Reading SIP meetings, we discussed the various diagnostic assessments available in the Elementary Learning Department Canvas course that align with the Science of Reading. Through faculty meetings, we analyzed the data and explored the Instructional Pathway Lessons in the Elementary Learning Department Canvas course that align with the Science of Reading. 51% of kindergarten students scored at a level 3 or higher on the FAST Early Literacy Assessment during progress monitoring 2 in December 2025. 53% of first and second grade students scored at a level 3 or higher on the FAST Literacy Assessment during progress monitoring 2 in December 2025. |
|||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||
| During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, interventionists, and ESE support facilitators, we changed instructional resources for students who were not showing gains. | |||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||
| During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, interventionists, and ESE support facilitators, we increased the amount of support a student is receiving, if instructional gaps were not closing. For students who closed academic gaps, tiered support was scaled back. | |||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May 2026, 79% of 3-5 grade students will score a level 3 or higher in ELA as measured by the FAST. | Science of Reading Implementation | F.A.S.T. Assessment | |||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||
| Implementation challenges encountered in the fall semester was identifying specific areas of need for small group instruction and utilizing resources to address those specific areas. Through Team Leader meetings and Reading SIP meetings, we discussed the various diagnostic assessments available in the Elementary Learning Department Canvas course that align with the Science of Reading. Through faculty meetings, we analyzed the data and explored the Instructional Pathway Lessons in the Elementary Learning Department Canvas course that align with the Science of Reading. 58% third through fifth grade students scored at a level 3 or higher on the FAST Literacy Assessment during progress monitoring 2 in December 2025. |
|||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||
| During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, interventionists, and ESE support facilitators, we changed instructional resources for students who were not showing gains. The intervention's strengths include providing targeted instruction for each student's area of weakness in the 6 areas of Reading: Phonological Awareness, Phonics, Encoding, Fluency, Vocabulary, and Oral Language. The intervention weaknesses include the amount of time it takes to administer the assessments in order to identify the appropriate deficiencies readers are experiencing. |
|||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||
| During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, interventionists, and ESE support facilitators, we increased the amount of support a student is receiving, if instructional gaps were not closing. For students who closed academic gaps, tiered support was scaled back. | |||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May 2026, 68% of 3-5 grade students will show learning gains in English Language Arts as measured by the FAST. | Science of Reading Implementation | F.A.S.T. Assessment | |||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Implementation challenges encountered in the fall semester was identifying specific areas of need for small group instruction and utilizing resources to address those specific areas. Through Team Leader meetings and Reading SIP meetings, we discussed the various diagnostic assessments available in the Elementary Learning Department Canvas course that align with the Science of Reading. Through faculty meetings, we analyzed the data and explored the Instructional Pathway Lessons in the Elementary Learning Department Canvas course that align with the Science of Reading. Based on the FAST PM2 data and growth, 56% of third through fifth grade students are likely to show learning gains in ELA. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| The intervention's strengths include providing targeted instruction for each student's area of weakness in the 6 areas of Reading: Phonological Awareness, Phonics, Encoding, Fluency, Vocabulary, and Oral Language. The intervention weaknesses include the amount of time it takes to administer the assessments in order to identify the appropriate deficiencies readers are experiencing. During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, interventionists, and ESE support facilitators, we changed instructional resources for students who were not showing gains |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, interventionists, and ESE support facilitators, we increased the amount of support a student is receiving, if instructional gaps were not closing. For students who closed academic gaps, tiered support was scaled back. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May 2026, 90% of 3-5 grade students will score a level 3 or higher in Mathematics as measured by the FAST. | Continue to implement strategies learned in Critical Content PD last year. | F.A.S.T. Assessment | |||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||
| Since we received the Critical Content professional development last year, we faced minimal implementation challenges. During our monthly Team Leader meetings, we discussed the strategies we learned last year and explained which strategies each team would implement in the upcoming month. Team Leaders explained the strategies to teachers new to our school who did not receive the professional development last year. 40% third through fifth grade students scored at a level 3 or higher on the FAST Mathematics Assessment during progress monitoring 2 in December 2025. |
|||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||
| An identified strength for our strategy is that teachers are better equipped to teach math concepts in an efficient and effective manner. There are no weakness to the strategies we are implementing. During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, interventionists, and ESE support facilitators, changed instructional resources for students who were not showing gains. |
|||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||
| During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, interventionists, and ESE support facilitators, we increased the amount of support a student is receiving, if instructional gaps were not closing. For students who have closed academic gaps, tiered support was scaled back. | |||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May 2026, the number of fifth grade students meeting proficiency in Science will increase from 74% to 76% as measured by the state standards' assessment. | Science Micro Assessments and Science End of Year Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Based on the district's mid-year science assessment administered in January 2026, 61% of fifth grade students showed proficiency. Implementation challenges encountered during the Fall semester include learning the new Science curriculum - Discovery Education. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, we will assign targeted remediation within Progress Learning for students with an average of less than 80%. The identified strength for the strategies implmented include plenty of resouces and lessons that provide hands-on experiences for students. The identified weakness for the strategies implemented include the pacing of the lessons. Teachers feel that Discovery Education is repetitive and moves at a slow pace. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| During our winter data chats with classroom teachers, we identified students that require an increased amount of support. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| School-Improvement-Plan-for-CERP-Review.pdf | Lori McLaughlin | 9/10/2025 |
| 25-26-CERP-MEETING-AGENDA-SIGN-IN.pdf | Lori McLaughlin | 9/11/2025 |
PLC Meeting Schedule
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| PLE_MTSS-Action-Plan-25-26.pdf | Rose Fultz | 9/8/2025 |
| Spring_25_Broward_Pembroke-Lakes-Elementary-School_SAM_Dashboard.pdf | Melissa Hallett | 4/9/2026 |
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
|
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| PLE-SPBP-25-26.pdf | Kristi Knapp | 4/28/2025 |
| Pembroke-Lakes-ES-SPBP-Feedback-2025-26.pdf | Georeane Nigro | 5/20/2025 |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Grade Level | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Attendance Type | School Goal |
|---|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| PLE-SIP-Attendance-Plan-25-26.pdf | Kristi Knapp | 9/9/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Signed-ASCSP-2025-2026.pdf | Rose Fultz | 8/29/2025 |
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| BPIE-2024.pdf | Trace Jones | 9/8/2025 |
| BPIE-Implementation-Plan-2024.pdf | Trace Jones | 9/8/2025 |
SAC Upload Center
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Pembroke-Lakes-Parent-Survey-2025.pdf | Marsha Wagner | 9/8/2025 |
| Pembroke-Lakes-Staff-Survey-2025.pdf | Marsha Wagner | 9/8/2025 |
| Pembroke-Lakes-Student-Survey-2025.pdf | Marsha Wagner | 9/8/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Sept-SIP.jpg | Rose Fultz | 9/11/2025 |
| Oct-2025-SIP.jpg | Rose Fultz | 11/12/2025 |
| November-2025-SIP.jpg | Rose Fultz | 11/12/2025 |
| December-2025-SIP.jpg | Rose Fultz | 12/3/2025 |
| January-2026-SIP.jpg | Rose Fultz | 1/9/2026 |
| Feb-2026.jpg | Rose Fultz | 3/12/2026 |
| March-2026.jpg | Rose Fultz | 3/12/2026 |
| April-FACE-Board.jpg | Rose Fultz | 4/1/2026 |