| School Name | Bayview ES (0641) | School Grade (2024 - 2025) | |
| Title 1 School | No | School Improvement (SI) | No |
| School of Excellence | Yes | ESSA School | No |
|
RAISE
Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence |
No | ||
| SAC Documentation/SAC Upload Center |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Executive-Summary-23-24-Bayview.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/18/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Bayview-ES-2026-Budget-Projection-of-Revenue_5.20.25.pdf | Christina Murphy | 6/11/2025 |
|
Using the data below, describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system. Kindergarten and First Grade students are given a phonics assessment then homogeneously grouped for explicit phonics instructions using the Fundations Program. Additionally, students who do not know letter names and sounds receive one-on-one instruction using the “Letter Book” strategy. Kindergarten students who require a PMP, are placed in a SIPPs intervention group, starting in January. First grade students scoring below grade level on the STAR will receive the SIPPS intervention, a double dose of Fundations, or additional small group reading instruction.
All second through fifth grade students are given a fluency probe in the first week of school. Any student reading below the 50th percentile is assessed for phonics deficits. Students struggling with decoding words in isolation are placed in an intervention using Phonics for Reading Levels A, B, and C as indicated by the inventory. Fourth and fifth grade students struggling with decoding multisyllabic words receive an intervention using the REWARDS program.
Second through fifth grade students who are not struggling with decoding but are below the 50th percentile in fluency receive an intervention with the Quick Reads program. Finally, students who struggle with comprehension receive an intervention using the Benchmark Advance Comprehension Intervention.
In math, students who scored a Level 1 or 2 on PM3 of the Math FAST assessment, will receive a Tier 2 or 3 intervention using the Reteach or MDIS component of the Envision Math curriculum. All students performing in the bottom quartile in reading or math will be invited to join our FAST tutorial afterschool camp. |
|
|
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May of 2026, 89% of students in grades K, 1 and 2 will demonstrate proficiency in ELA/Reading as measured by the PM3 Early Literacy (K) and STAR Assessment (Grades 1 and 2). | Lisa Mueller will conduct PD for teachers on effective feedback strategies. | $0.00 | Data Chat Meetings | ||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| According to the STAR Assessment for Reading, K-2 students increased Achievement Levels (from September's Progress Monitoring 1 to December's Progress Monitoring 2) in the following ways: PM1 PM2 37% 64% (+27) Our goal is to be at 89% in ELA K, 1, and 2. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| To sustain the Intended Outcome of 89% of of our K-2 students to Achieve at Proficiency Levels of 3,4 and 5, the following action steps must occur: 1. Restructure student groupings based on research-based intervention programs to meet the needs of all students (with Tier 2 and 3 students) receiving a double-dose of instruction within the 120-minute Literacy Block. 2. Restructure staff support based on research-based intervention programs to meet the needs of all students (with Tier 2 and 3 students) receiving a double-dose of instruction within the 120-minute Literacy Block (For example: ESE schedule of support/IDEA support). 3. Frequent analysis of data via data meetings and Professional Learning Communities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| In order to sustain the Intended Outcome of 89% of of our K-2 students to Achieve at Proficiency Levels of 3,4 and 5, the following action steps must occur: 1. Restructure student groupings based on research-based intervention programs to meet the needs of all students (with Tier 2 and 3 students) receiving a double-dose of instruction within the 120-minute Literacy Block. 2. Restructure staff support based on research-based intervention programs to meet the needs of all students (with Tier 2 and 3 students) receiving a double-dose of instruction within the 120-minute Literacy Block (For example: ESE schedule of support/IDEA support). 3. Frequent analysis of data via data meetings and Professional Learning Communities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May of 2026, 85% of students in grade 5 will demonstrate proficiency as measured by the 2026 Science State Assessment. | New Science Adoption training. | n/a | It will be monitored through classroom walkthroughs. | ||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| According to the Mid-Year Science Assessment, 5th-grade students increased Achievement Levels (from September's Progress Monitoring 1 to December's Progress Monitoring 2) in the following ways: Beginning of the Year 36% Middle of the Year 65% Increase (+29) Our schoolwide goal is 85% proficiency. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| At the mid-year point, progress monitoring data has been instrumental in evaluating student mastery across the four major science strands: Nature of Science, Earth and Space Science, Physical Science, and Life Science. Through consistent use of mini-assessments, common formative assessments, and standards-based tracking, we have been able to identify trends in student understanding and areas requiring targeted intervention. Ongoing analysis of mini-assessment data has allows us to:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| To reach our goal of 85% for our 5th-grade students, we will identify and place students in an ELO Science opportunity.
Students who do not demonstrate proficiency on the mid-year assessment will be invited to participate in a Winter Science Extended Learning Opportunity (ELO). This program will:
The goal of the Winter ELO is to accelerate student progress and close learning gaps prior to state assessments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Reflections (optional): Please add any additional reflections for this Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||
In addition to student supports, our school-wide Professional Learning Community (PLC) is focusing on strengthening science instruction. The PLC is centered on:
Through collaborative planning, data analysis, and shared instructional strategies, teachers are working collectively to improve student outcomes across all science strands. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurable Outcome (SMART Goal) | Professional Development | Budget | Monitoring | Results (End of Year) |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By May of 2026, 80% of students in grades 3, 4 and 5 will demonstrate a learning gain in ELA/Reading as measured by the 2026 PM3 FAST. | Lisa Mueller will conduct PD for teachers on effective feedback strategies. | n/a | Data Chats, Classroom Walkthroughs | ||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Year Reflection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: Is desired progress being made to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus by the end of the school year? | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence: Provide evidence of the implementation challenges the school encountered during the Fall semester. Describe the changes made to address these challenges. | |||||||||||||||||||||
According to F.A.S.T. Progress Monitoring #2 (December 2025) results in Reading, 75% of students in grades 3–5 are currently on track to demonstrate a learning gain by the end of the school year. This indicates that the majority of students are showing adequate progress toward grade-level expectations. Additionally, 54% of fourth- and fifth-grade students have already demonstrated measurable learning gains at the mid-year point. This includes growth made by three retained third-grade students, reflecting positive progress among students who required additional time and support to strengthen foundational literacy skills. These results suggest that targeted interventions, differentiated small-group instruction, and ongoing progress monitoring are contributing to student growth. Continued focus on data-driven instruction, intensive support for students not yet on track, and strategic use of intervention resources will be critical to increasing the percentage of students demonstrating learning gains by the end of the year. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Evidence-based Interventions/Strategies: What was each Intervention/Strategy’s identified strengths and weaknesses? | |||||||||||||||||||||
In order to sustain and increase the percentage of students achieving learning gains in ELA/Reading, the following strategic actions will be implemented:
Through intentional restructuring of instruction, strategic staffing, continuous data analysis, and extended learning opportunities, we are positioned to sustain and strengthen student learning gains in ELA/Reading for grades 3–5. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| New Actions: Describe any new actions that are needed to accomplish the intended outcome for the Area of Focus. | |||||||||||||||||||||
To sustain and increase the percentage of students achieving learning gains in ELA/Reading to 80%, the following strategic actions will be implemented:
Through intentional restructuring of instructional groups, strategic alignment of staff resources, continuous data-driven decision-making, and expanded learning opportunities, we are positioned to sustain and achieve our goal of 80% of students demonstrating learning gains in ELA/Reading. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| CERP-Plan.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/19/2025 |
PLC Meeting Schedule
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| MTSS-Plan.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/19/2025 |
| Spring_25_Broward_Bayview-Elementary-School_SAM_Dashboard.pdf | Lauren Kirik | 11/12/2025 |
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
|
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Bayview-ES-Feedback-2025-2026.pdf | Valerie Blackwell | 5/21/2025 |
| 0641_04292025_SPBP-25-26.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/18/2025 |
| SPBP-Template-2026-27-1.docx | Michael Breslaw | 4/30/2026 |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Regular Attenders (0%-4.9% Absent) |
At Risk (5%-9.9% Absent) |
Chronic (10%-19.9% Absent) |
Severe Chronic (20% or more Absent) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Year | Grade Level | Population | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % |
| Attendance Type | School Goal |
|---|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance-Plan-Bayview.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/19/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| ASCP-Bayview25-26.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/30/2025 |
No files have been uploaded.
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| SBPIE_2425_060641.pdf | Christina Murphy | 6/11/2025 |
SAC Upload Center
|
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Bayview-ES-BCPS-PARENT-CUSTOMER-SURVEY-2025.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/5/2025 |
| Bayview-ES-BCPS-SCHOOL-STAFF-CUSTOMER-SURVEY-2025.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/5/2025 |
| Bayview-ES-BCPS-STUDENT-(Grades-3-5)-CUSTOMER-SURVEY-2025.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/5/2025 |
| File Name | File Uploaded By | Upload Date |
|---|---|---|
| Family-and.pdf | CARMEN COLON | 9/19/2025 |